"And then he said..." - February 24th, 2006 [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Random

[ website | homepage ]
[ userinfo | deadjournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| MyBathroomFinder MyBrilliantWeekend Brits on Pole MyGardenFinder MyKitchenFinder ]

February 24th, 2006

Coming from behind with a late surge [Feb. 24th, 2006|12:03 pm]

I have finally allowed my name to be included on Ming Campbell's list of website supporters - somewhat late in the day, I admit, but it seemed the right time at last.

Anyone who's been following this journal right through from when I stopped writing about buttocks, dead people, shopping trollies and the North Circular, and started writing about politics, will remember it took me quite a while to decide to vote for him. Initially I planned to write in Charles Kennedy's name.

Looking back at the posts I've written, I see a steady journey to get where I am today. The leadership campaign progressed, too, with the big story being Chris Huhne's surge. It seems to me that it started with a general expectation of a Campbell victory (a Steve Bell cartoon warned "Ask not for whom the Ming mongs - it mongs for you") and was then thrown into confusion by his stumble at PMQs. It stayed confused for some time until the Huhne Army started its march. But now, in the final stages, it seems to have settled down and swung back to Ming. Certainly there has been a recent fightback online, as suggested by the increased number of bloggers declared for him (see here and later entries on Pigeon Post and here on the Campbell Campaign blog). I also sense that Simon might have a little wind back in his sails - though probably not enough to make a difference.

So I suspect it will all come down to the following factors:

  • When did the majority of people vote? Was it at the height of the Huhne blitzkreig? Or before, when ballot papers first arrived and people lunged at their initial choices, or will it happen in a day or two at the last possible moment?
  • Are the late voters soft Campbellites and soft Hughes supporters, waiting to see if Huhne does enough to convince them to vote against their initial favourite? And, if they are, will he?
  • Is the Huhne phenomenon an internet and media thing, or does it extend to the armchair, offline, non politics-junky membership?
  • How will the areas with the greatest membership - London especially - vote? Did Simon's lacklustre mayoral campaign kill him stone dead in the capital, or will his years as the sole London MP see him through?
  • If, as seems likely, Simon is third, where will his transfers go? Will they split broadly equally, will they go to Huhne because Hughes fans like an underdog and don't like Campbell, or will they go to Campbell because his supporters will pick the other famous name over a moderniser with a taint of the Orange Book about him?

For what it's worth, my view is that the bulk of votes were cast at the height of Huhne's surge, which will obviously help him a lot. I think he'll pick up very few of the late votes - if people were going to be swayed by him they would have been by now. I think London will (in many cases reluctantly) not favour Simon but will shade towards Huhne, as will Simon's transfers - but not by much in either case.

I think the combination of those factors will ensure that Huhne runs it very close, but I still think Ming will win. The two of them did not start equal, Campbell was the favourite and Huhne was the one nobody had heard of. He needed a massive swing his way just to get in the game. He got that massive swing, but all it did is make him a genuine contender. I don't think it's made him the winner.

But of course - no-one really knows anything at the moment. We could all be wrong.

It's kinda fun, really.

LinkPoint of Order, Mr Speaker!

Only in America [Feb. 24th, 2006|05:39 pm]

You couldn't do this over here. Someone - probably those great defenders of children, the tabloid press - would call it a shopping catalogue for paedophiles. But over in Tampa, Florida, there's a project called the Heart Gallery that's making a real difference for kids with no families who are hoping for adoption.

Briefly, amateur and professional photographers in Hillsborough County, Tampa, take portraits of children in local foster care, display the pictures and the kids' stories in a gallery (sometimes with audio messages from the children), and invite the public along to have the hearts ripped out of their chests and get the kids adopted. It works, a lot. Something like 40 per cent of the children end up with families as a result.

People make strange decisions when it comes to adoption. I know - I'm adopted myself and I'm told the first couple who looked at me back in '68 rejected me because I was too old (five months!) and too Spanish-looking. So my first thought was that this was a bit dodgy - a sort of Darwinian selection process where the pretty get selected and the ugly and ill-favoured disappear back into the mud.

But it's not - the photos are wonderful, and they're of all sorts of children with all sorts of appearances. You'd want to give not just any of them a home, but all of them.

Apparently there are about 70 of these galleries across the US, but this one is the first to include audio messages from the kids. I can only imagine what it's like to listen to them. They must be the foster care equivalent of the 9/11 answerphone messages: for a lot of these kids, not finding an adoptive family is a kind of death - the death of opportunity, the final chance gone to lead what most of us would term a normal life with loved ones and ambitions and a realistic chance of achievement.

I heard about this over at Heck's Kitchen, where JM linked to it because her sisters are among the photographers (in fact, one is an organiser). She also linked to a great article from the local press (links at the bottom of this post, and a hat-tip to Jenny for the text that my second paragraph is ripped off from).

As I get older, I find I feel more and more strongly about adoption. Not my own adoption - I'm very relaxed about that - but about the subject itself. What that means in practice is not something I fully understand - I don't know where that particular thought process is taking me. I don't even really know how to finish this paragraph about it, so I'll just let it trail off here unsatisfyingly while I let the thoughts brew a while longer.

But I do know that I think the Heart Gallery of Tampa Bay is a bloody wonderful thing and I wish it was possible to do the same everywhere.

Link1 intervention|Point of Order, Mr Speaker!

navigation
[ viewing | February 24th, 2006 ]
[ go | Previous Day|Next Day ]